Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/23151
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMacLennan, A.-
dc.contributor.authorMyers, S.-
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, A.-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationMedical Journal of Australia, 2006; 184(1):27-31-
dc.identifier.issn0025-729X-
dc.identifier.issn1326-5377-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/23151-
dc.descriptionThe document attached has been archived with permission from the editor of the Medical Journal of Australia. An external link to the publisher’s copy is included.-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To survey the use, cost, beliefs and quality of life of users of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Design: A representative population survey conducted in 2004 with longitudinal comparison to similar 1993 and 2000 surveys. Participants: 3015 South Australian respondents over the age of 15 years (71.7% participation). Results: In 2004, CAMs were used by 52.2% of the population. Greatest use was in women aged 25–34 years, with higher income and education levels. CAM therapists had been visited by 26.5% of the population. In those with children, 29.9% administered CAMs to them and 17.5% of the children had visited CAM therapists. The total extrapolated cost in Australia of CAMs and CAM therapists in 2004 was AUD$1.8 billion, which was a decrease from AUD$2.3 billion in 2000. CAMs were used mostly to maintain general health. The users of CAM had lower quality-of-life scores than non-users. Among CAM users, 49.7% used conventional medicines on the same day and 57.2% did not report the use of CAMs to their doctor. About half of the respondents assumed that CAMs were independently tested by a government agency; of these, 74.8% believed they were tested for quality and safety, 21.8% for what they claimed, and 17.9% for efficacy. Conclusions: Australians continue to use high levels of CAMs and CAM therapists. The public is often unaware that CAMs are not tested by the Therapeutic Goods Administration for efficacy or safety.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAlastair H MacLennan, Stephen P Myers and Anne W Taylor-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAustralasian Med Publ Co Ltd-
dc.source.urihttp://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/184_01_020106/mac10324_fm.html-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectComplementary Therapies-
dc.subjectHealth Care Surveys-
dc.subjectLongitudinal Studies-
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice-
dc.subjectQuality of Life-
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Factors-
dc.subjectAdolescent-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectHealth Expenditures-
dc.subjectSouth Australia-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.titleThe continuing use of complementary and alternative medicine in South Australia: costs and beliefs in 2004-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00092.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidTaylor, A. [0000-0002-4422-7974]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
23151_hdl.pdfPublished version278.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.