Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Citation:||Adelaide Law Review, 1964; 2(2):237-262|
|Publisher:||Adelaide Law Review Association, School of Law, University of Adelaide|
|Contents:||Painter v. Painter (Matrimonial Causes) pp. 237-242. General Distributors Ltd. v. Paramotors Limited (Mercantile Law) Unauthorised disposition by non-owner - Agency - Parol Evidence Rule - Hire Purchase Agreements Act pp. 242-252. Atkins v. Golding (Ultra vires) Statutory interpretation - prohibition as distinct from regulation pp. 252-256. Wilson v. O'Sullivan and Mills v. Brebner (Police Offences Act) Loitering pp. 256-258. Lamshed v. Lamshed (Laches) Delay after issue of writ pp. 258-262|
|Appears in Collections:||ALR Vol. 2, Noes 1-3, 1963-1966|
Files in This Item:
|alr_V2n2_1964_RecentCases.pdf||1.45 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.