1. Adelaide Research & Scholarship
  2. Schools and Disciplines
  3. Law School
  4. Adelaide Law Review
  5. ALR Vol. 2, Noes 1-3, 1963-1966
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/14922
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.issued1964en
dc.identifier.citationAdelaide Law Review, 1964; 2(2):237-262en
dc.identifier.issn0065-1915en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/14922-
dc.description.tableofcontentsPainter v. Painter (Matrimonial Causes) pp. 237-242. General Distributors Ltd. v. Paramotors Limited (Mercantile Law) Unauthorised disposition by non-owner - Agency - Parol Evidence Rule - Hire Purchase Agreements Act pp. 242-252. Atkins v. Golding (Ultra vires) Statutory interpretation - prohibition as distinct from regulation pp. 252-256. Wilson v. O'Sullivan and Mills v. Brebner (Police Offences Act) Loitering pp. 256-258. Lamshed v. Lamshed (Laches) Delay after issue of writ pp. 258-262en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAdelaide Law Review Association, School of Law, University of Adelaideen
dc.titleRecent casesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
Appears in Collections:ALR Vol. 2, Noes 1-3, 1963-1966

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
alr_V2n2_1964_RecentCases.pdf1.45 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.