Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/133180
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Same room - different windows? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility in healthy adults |
Author: | Howlett, C.A. Wewege, M.A. Berryman, C. Oldach, A. Jennings, E. Moore, E. Karran, E.L. Szeto, K. Pronk, L. Miles, S. Moseley, G.L. |
Citation: | Clinical Psychology Review, 2021; 88:102061-1-102061-21 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Issue Date: | 2021 |
ISSN: | 0272-7358 1873-7811 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Caitlin A. Howlett, Michael A. Wewege, Carolyn Berryman, Annika Oldach, Elizabeth Jennings, Emily Moore, Emma L. Karran, Kimberley Szeto, Leander Pronk, Stephanie Miles, G. Lorimer Moseley |
Abstract: | Cognitive flexibility can be thought of as the ability to effectively adapt one's cognitive and behavioural strategies in response to changing task or environmental demands. To substantiate the common inference that self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility provide ‘different windows into the same room’, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility are related in healthy adults. Ten databases and relevant grey literature were searched from inception. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were adhered to. Twenty-one articles satisfied our inclusion criteria. A multi-level random-effects meta-analysis revealed no relationship (0.05, 95% CI = −0.00 to 0.10). Random-effects meta-analyses raised the possibility that the Cognitive Flexibility Scale and the Trail Making Test – part B (time) may be related (0.19, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.31). We conclude that the relationship between self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility is not large enough to be considered convincing evidence for the two assessment approaches sharing construct validity. These results have clear implications for assessing and interpreting cognitive flexibility research and clinical practice. |
Keywords: | Cognitive flexibility; self-report test; neuropsychological test; systematic review; healthy adults; correlation |
Rights: | © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102061 |
Grant ID: | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1127155 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1178444 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102061 |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.