Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/131617
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Shoot thinning of Semillon in a hot climate did not improve yield and berry and wine quality
Author: De Bei, R.
Wang, X.
Papagiannis, L.
Fuentes, S.
Gilliham, M.
Tyerman, S.
Collins, C.
Citation: OENO One, 2020; 54(3):469-484
Publisher: International Viticulture and Enology Society - IVES
Issue Date: 2020
ISSN: 2494-1271
2494-1271
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Roberta De Bei, Xiaoyi Wang, Lukas Papagiannis, Sigfredo Fuentes, Matthew Gilliham, Steve Tyerman and Cassandra Collins
Abstract: Aim: Shoot thinning is a common canopy management practice used to obtain a desired shoot density and to improve canopy microclimate. Since thinning is often carried out manually, the cost can be high. In this study the effect of severe shoot thinning (50 % of shoots removed) applied at EL 15 was investigated by comparing yield components, canopy size, berry and wine chemistry, and sensory attributes to a non-thinned control for the variety Semillon. The objective was to determine whether shoot thinning could change canopy architecture and lead to improved fruit and wine chemistry and sensory characteristics. Methods and Results: The trial was carried out over four consecutive growing seasons (starting in 2014-15) in the Semillon block of the Coombe vineyard (Waite Campus, the University of Adelaide). Canopy architecture was monitored at key phenological stages in each season and yield components were assessed at harvest. The harvested fruit was used for chemical and sensory analysis of the berries. Wines were made and their chemistry and sensorial attributes assessed. Shoot thinning reduced the total leaf area in only two of the four seasons, but single shoot leaf area and cane weight were higher in shoot-thinned vines in all seasons. Shoot thinning did not reduce yield, despite a large reduction in bunch number, because of increased bunch weight. Shoot thinning did not change berry and wine chemistry. Similarly, little differences were observed in the sensory profile of berries and wines, and the assessors preferred the wines obtained from shoot thinned vines in the last season only. Conclusions: In this study, shoot thinning increased the leaf area per shoot and the cane weight, but yield and grape and wine chemistry were unaffected. The vine balance indices leaf area/yield and yield/pruning weight were also unaffected by the treatment, despite its intensity (50 % of shoots removed). Significance and impact of the study: The practice of shoot thinning when applied at EL stage 15 (8-9 leaves separated) was not effective as a technique to improve canopy microclimate and berry and wine chemistry for the white variety Semillon in a hot Australian climate. By not applying shoot thinning growers could potentially make significant savings without affecting yield or wine properties. Further research is needed to explore the effect and timing of shoot thinning on other varieties and in different environments.
Keywords: canopy management; shoot thinning; leaf area; canopy porosity; Semillon; hot climate
Rights: © 2020 International Viticulture and Enology Society - IVES. . Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
DOI: 10.20870/oeno-one.2020.54.3.2984
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2020.54.3.2984
Appears in Collections:Agriculture, Food and Wine publications
ARC Training Centre for Innovative Wine Production publications
Aurora harvest 8

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_131617.pdfPublished version1.67 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.