Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/131550
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: DNA extraction approaches substantially influence the assessment of the human breast milk microbiome
Author: Douglas, C.A.
Ivey, K.L.
Papanicolas, L.E.
Best, K.P.
Muhlhausler, B.S.
Rogers, G.B.
Citation: Scientific Reports, 2020; 10(1):123-1-123-10
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Issue Date: 2020
ISSN: 2045-2322
2045-2322
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Chloe A. Douglas, Kerry L. Ivey, Lito E. Papanicolas, Karen P. Best, Beverly S. Muhlhausler and Geraint B. Rogers
Abstract: In addition to providing nutritional and bioactive factors necessary for infant development, human breast milk contains bacteria that contribute to the establishment of commensal microbiota in the infant. However, the composition of this bacterial community differs considerably between studies. We hypothesised that bacterial DNA extraction methodology from breast milk samples are a substantial contributor to these inter-study differences. We tested this hypothesis by applying five widely employed methodologies to a mock breast milk sample and four individual human breast milk samples. Significant differences in DNA yield and purity were observed between methods (P < 0.05). Microbiota composition, assessed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, also differed significantly with extraction methodology (P < 0.05), including in the contribution of contaminant signal. Concerningly, many of the bacterial taxa identified here as contaminants have been reported as components of the breast milk microbiome in other studies. These findings highlight the importance of using stringent, well-validated, DNA extraction methodologies for analysis of the breast milk microbiome, and exercising caution interpreting microbiota data from low-biomass contexts.
Keywords: Milk, Human
Humans
DNA, Bacterial
Chemical Fractionation
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Microbiota
Rights: © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55568-y
Grant ID: NHMRC
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55568-y
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_131550.pdf1.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.