Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/9634
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of ScienceĀ® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Clifton, P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Noakes, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Keogh, J. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The Journal of Nutrition, 2004; 134(7):1741-1745 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-3166 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1541-6100 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/9634 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Studies in women with type 2 diabetes demonstrated adverse effects on body fat distribution of a low-fat diet relative to a high monounsaturated fat diet. We performed a randomized 12-wk parallel design study of two 6000-kJ diets: 35% energy from fat (high monounsaturated fat diet, HIMO), or 12% energy from fat (very low-fat diet, VLF) to determine whether this also occurred in nondiabetic women. Body fat distribution, fasting plasma glucose, blood pressure, and fasting serum lipids were measured at wk 0 and 12 in 62 women (BMI > 27 kg/m(2)). Weight loss (9.5 +/- 2.4 vs. 9.4 +/- 3.4 kg, VLF vs. HIMO) and total fat loss (6.1 +/- 2.4 vs. 6.3 +/- 2.7 kg, VLF vs. HIMO) did not differ in the groups. There was a diet x menopausal status interaction in lean mass changes (P = 0.005) such that in premenopausal women, HIMO produced a lower loss of lean mass than the low-fat diet (0.4 +/- 2.3 vs. 2.9 +/- 2.7 kg, P = 0.006) with the opposite but nonsignificant effect seen in postmenopausal women. There was a greater decrease in total plasma cholesterol in women who consumed VLF compared with those who consumed HIMO (0.82 +/- 0.0.51 vs. 0.50 +/- 0.48 mmol/L, P < 0.001 for time, P < 0.05 for diet effect). This was also true for the change in HDL cholesterol (0.18 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.04 +/- 0.19 mmol/L, VLF and HIMO, respectively, P < 0.001 for time, P < 0.05 for diet effect). The LDL/HDL ratio was reduced in both groups with no effect of diet (0.16 +/- 0.51 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.45, VLF and HIMO, respectively, P < 0.05). In conclusion, weight, total fat mass, and regional fat mass loss did not differ in the 2 groups of women but there was an apparent preservation of lean mass in premenopausal women consuming HIMO. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Amer Inst Nutrition | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.7.1741 | - |
dc.subject | Humans | - |
dc.subject | Obesity | - |
dc.subject | Insulin | - |
dc.subject | Blood Glucose | - |
dc.subject | Lipids | - |
dc.subject | Dietary Fats | - |
dc.subject | Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated | - |
dc.subject | Body Mass Index | - |
dc.subject | Diet | - |
dc.subject | Tissue Distribution | - |
dc.subject | Postmenopause | - |
dc.subject | Premenopause | - |
dc.subject | Blood Pressure | - |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject | Female | - |
dc.title | Very low-fat (12%) and high monounsaturated fat (35%) diets do not differentially affect abdominal fat loss in overweight, nondiabetic women | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/jn/134.7.1741 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Clifton, P. [0000-0002-6411-626X] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 4 Medicine publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.