Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Type: Journal article
Title: Zentai and the troubles of extradition
Author: Stubbs, M.
Citation: Monash University Law Review, 2013; 39(3):894-914
Publisher: Monash University, Faculty of Law
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 0311-3140
Statement of
Matthew Stubbs
Abstract: In Minister for Home Affairs (Cth) v Zentai, the High Court held that the Treaty on Extradition between Australia and the Republic of Hungary prevented Mr Zentai’s extradition to face accusations of committing a retrospective war crimes offence. The case is, in all likelihood, the last episode in the history of Australia’s contributions to bringing to justice alleged war criminals from the Second World War. The extraordinary time and resources devoted to the ultimately abortive extradition process in Zentai raise questions about the effi ciency of the procedures under the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth). Further, given the strict textual interpretation adopted by the Court, amendment to some of Australia’s extradition treaties may be required to uphold the key purpose of extradition arrangements, which is to facilitate international cooperation in the apprehension and surrender for trial of those accused of serious criminal offences.
Rights: © Monash University
Published version:
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Law publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access1.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.