Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/79756
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Symeonidis, P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Iselin, L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chehade, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Stavrou, P. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Foot and Ankle International, 2013; 34(3):345-350 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1071-1007 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1944-7876 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/79756 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Syndesmotic injuries occur in up to 11% of all ankle injuries. Whereas the optimal fixation of syndesmotic injuries remains controversial, pitfalls in their management can lead to poor outcomes. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of all ankle fractures operated on at a level 1 trauma center over a 7-year period. All cases with syndesmotic fixation were classified and patients’ notes and x-rays were reviewed. The timing of definitive syndesmotic fixation, the type of fixation (screw size and number, number of cortices), and the number of unplanned, syndesmotic-related reoperations were recorded. Seventy syndesmotic ruptures were operated on during the study period. Results: There were 19 unplanned reoperations. The 3 reasons for reoperation identified were failure to diagnose the syndesmotic injury 9/19 (47%), failure to achieve an anatomic reduction 6/19 (31%), and loss of reduction due to fixation failure 4/19 (21%). The type of fixation was not correlated with the failure rate, nor were the experience of the surgeon, the gender or the age of the patient. Conclusions: The reoperation rate for syndesmotic fixation may be higher than previously thought. In order to reduce the pitfalls in their treatment, we emphazise the importance of 3 critical points in the management of these injuries: suspect the injury, document the stability of the syndesmosis, and reduce the fibula anatomically. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Panagiotis D. Symeonidis, Lukas D. Iselin, Mellick Chehade, and Peter Stavrou | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Amer Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Soc Inc | - |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2013 | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071100712470914 | - |
dc.subject | syndesmotic injury | - |
dc.subject | diastasis | - |
dc.subject | failure | - |
dc.subject | outcome | - |
dc.title | Common pitfalls in syndesmotic rupture management: a clinical audit | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1071100712470914 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Chehade, M. [0000-0001-6931-2393] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Orthopaedics and Trauma publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.