Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/48912
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoldstone, Alan Marken
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the Oceanic Conference on International Studies, 2-4 July 2008: pp.1www-36wwwen
dc.identifier.issn1478-1158en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/48912-
dc.description.abstractThis article locates the perceived antipathy that Mill thought inherent to representative government and liberty in his contributions to debates surrounding nineteenth century international crises, and seeks to address an emerging interpretation which casts Mill’s IR philosophy as inherently imperial. Additional themes to be explored are the centrality of a ‘philosophy of history’ in Mill’s political thought and the extent to which Mill can legitimately be considered the intellectual precursor of modern liberal international thought.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.source.urihttp://www.polsis.uq.edu.au//OCIS/Goldstone.pdfen
dc.titleJohn Stuart Mill on International Legitimacyen
dc.typeConference paperen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of History and Politics : Historyen
dc.contributor.conferenceOceanic Conference on International Studies (2008 : Brisbane, Australia)en
Appears in Collections:History publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.