Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/48285
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPatrikeeff, Felixen
dc.contributor.advisorMacintyre, Clementen
dc.contributor.authorTsoundarou, Paulen
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/48285-
dc.description.abstractSince the end of the Cold War, political and geographical realities have changed considerably. One such reality was the balance of power between East and West, which was especially visible in Europe. The contest between rivals, the Warsaw Pact and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), was over. Ultimately, NATO found itself the pre-eminent security organisation in Europe. The new post-cold war environment forced questions about the appropriate role for NATO. However, that changed with both the process of NATO expansion into former Warsaw pact countries and the ethnic conflicts throughout the former Yugoslavia. NATO found a new purpose during the violent dissolution of Yugoslavia as ‘peace-enforcer’ in the Balkan region. The focus of this thesis is NATO’s role in peace-enforcement in the former Yugoslavia. It examines how NATO dealt with the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Warsaw Pact. Specifically, how NATO managed to re-establish its relevance as a security organisation. NATO’s military intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo were crucial in securing the end of hostilities in both those regions. NATO’s Implementation Force (IFOR), Stabilisation Force (SFOR) and Kosovo Force (KFOR) all played significant roles in subsequent peace-enforcement and peace-building roles in the region by suppressing violence through power projection and institution building. In 2001, NATO undertook a third operation in the Balkans, that time of a more limited nature, disarming ethnic Albanians in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. NATO’s presence there also encouraged stability. This thesis argues that, ultimately, NATO maintained its relevance by the establishing a new role for itself after the Cold War through Eastward expansion and in suppressing ethnic conflict in the Balkans. Both these roles have been successful. The decisive interventions in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and FYROM forced the belligerents to stop fighting. NATO’s subsequent enforcement of the peace has stopped each conflict from flaring up again. With NATO membership now including most of Europe, it remains the only viable security organisation on the continent. NATO’s effectiveness as a security organisation was demonstrated with its ability to end the conflict in the Balkans and providing a stable environment for the people of the region. This intervention was crucial to the definition of a new role for NATO in the post-Cold War world.en
dc.subjectNATO; Yugoslavia; Balkans; peace enforcement; North Atlantic Treaty Organisation; Kosovo; Bosnia; FYROM; ethnic conflicten
dc.subject.lcshNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization Armed Forces Yugoslavia.en
dc.subject.lcshPeacekeeping forces Yugoslavia.en
dc.subject.lcshYugoslavia History 1992-2003.en
dc.titleNATO’s eastward expansion and peace-enforcement role in the violent dissolution of Yugoslavia: 1994-2004.en
dc.typeThesisen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of History and Politics : Politicsen
dc.provenanceCopyright material removed from digital thesis. See print copy in University of Adelaide Library for full text.en
dc.description.dissertationThesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of History and Politics 2008en
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf89.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.