Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/39278
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of ScienceĀ® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Peace, Adrian John | en |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Anthropology Today, 2003; 19(5):1-2 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0268-540X | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/39278 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Comments on the politics of Australian anthropology. Major reason for anthropology's absence from the public arena; Criticism of anthropological involvement; Vulnerability of anthropology; Anthropological contribution to the Hindmarsh Island business. | en |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Adrian Peace | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Blackwell | en |
dc.subject | Anthropology; Australia; Politics & government; Hindmarsh Island (Aust.) | en |
dc.title | Hindmarsh Island and the politics of anthropology | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.school | School of Social Sciences : Anthropology | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1467-8322.00214 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Anthropology & Development Studies publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.