Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/28358
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Conference paper
Title: Optimal wavelet denoising for smart bio-monitor systems
Author: Messer, S.
Agzarian, J.
Abbott, D.
Citation: Smart electronics and MEMS II : 13-15 December 2000, Melbourne, Australia / Derek Abbott, Vijay K. Varadan, Karl F. Boehringer (eds.), pp. 66-79
Part of: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Publisher: THE SOCIETY OF PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
Publisher Place: PO BOX 10 BELLINGHAM WASHINGTON USA
Issue Date: 2001
Series/Report no.: Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering ; 4236.
ISBN: 081943910x
ISSN: 0277-786X
Conference Name: Smart Electronics and MEMS II (2000 : Melbourne, Australia)
Editor: Abbott, D.
Varadan, V.K.
Boehringer, K.F.
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Sheila R. Messer, John Agzarian, and Derek Abbott
Abstract: Future smart-systems promise many benefits for biomedicaldiagnostics. The ideal is for simple portable systems that displayand interpret information from smart integrated probes or MEMS-baseddevices. In this paper, we will discuss a step towards this visionwith a heart bio-monitor case study. An electronic stethoscope isused to record heart soundsand the problem of extracting noise from the signal is addressed viathe use of wavelets and averaging. In our example of heartbeat analysis,phonocardiograms (PCGs) have many advantages in that they may bereplayed and analysed for spectral and frequency information. Manysources of noise may pollute a PCG including foetal breath sounds ifthe subject is pregnant, lung and breath sounds, environmental noiseand noise from contact between the recording device and the skin.Wavelets can be employed to denoise the PCG. The signal isdecomposed by a discrete wavelet transform. Due to the efficientdecomposition of heart signals, their wavelet coefficients tend to bemuch larger than those due to noise. Thus, coefficients below acertain level are regarded as noise and are thresholded out. Thesignal can then be reconstructed without significant loss ofinformation in the signal. The questions that this study attempts toanswer are which wavelet families, levels of decomposition, andthresholding techniques best remove the noise in a PCG. The use ofaveraging in combination with wavelet denoising is alsoaddressed. Possible applications of the Hilbert Transform toheart sound analysis are discussed.
Rights: © 2003 COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering
DOI: 10.1117/12.418781
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.418781
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Electrical and Electronic Engineering publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.