Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/1435
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: An assessment of attitudes to, and extent of, the practice of denture marking in South Australia
Author: Alexander, P.
Taylor, J.
Szuster, F.
Brown, K.
Citation: Australian Dental Journal, 1998; 43(5):337-341
Publisher: Wiley
Issue Date: 1998
ISSN: 0045-0421
1834-7819
Statement of
Responsibility: 
P. M. V. Alexander, J.A Taylor, F.S.P Szuster, K.A. Brown
Abstract: Denture marking or labelling is not a new concept in either prosthetic or forensic dentistry and its routine practice has been urged by forensic odontologists internationally for many years. In the general community it is often recommended for institutionalized persons to prevent confusion of ownership of dentures. In Australia, the Nursing Home Standards require that dentures of residents be 'discreetly labelled' and marking of all dentures is recommended by the Australian Dental Association. In some countries the marking of dentures is regulated by legislation, but elsewhere there seems to be a reluctance to effect this practice. Various methods which have been proposed include the insertion of an identifying label during the fabrication of the dentures with the utilization of a number of materials and coding systems. This study reports the results of a survey undertaken to determine the extent of the practice of denture marking in South Australia, the methods in use, and the attitudes of dentists, dental technicians and institutions to it. The results indicated that 24.5 per cent of all practitioners providing removable prostheses to their patients include an identifying label as part of the service on some occasions. This included 19.9 per cent of general dental practitioners, 25 per cent of specialist prosthodontists, 57.1 per cent of practitioners with training in forensic odontology, and 43.5 per cent of clinical dental technicians. No practitioner labelled dentures routinely. Reasons cited for not labelling dentures included cost, lack of awareness of standards and recommendations and a belief that it was of little importance.
Keywords: Diphosphonates, adverse effects
Jaw Diseases, chemically induced
Osteonecrosis, chemically induced
Tooth Extraction, adverse effects
Description: The document attached has been archived with permission from the Australian Dental Association. An external link to the publisher’s copy is included.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00185.x
Published version: http://www.ada.org.au/App_CmsLib/Media/Lib/0610/M28891_v1_632973859990441250.pdf
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Dentistry publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Alexander.pdf59.31 kBPublisher's PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.