Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/133857
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Use of Heart Failure Medical Therapies Among Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Insights From INTERMACS
Author: Khazanie, P.
Hammill, B.G.
Patel, C.B.
Kiernan, M.S.
Cooper, L.B.
Arnold, S.V.
Fendler, T.J.
Spertus, J.A.
Curtis, L.H.
Hernandez, A.F.
Citation: Journal of Cardiac Failure, 2016; 22(9):672-679
Publisher: Elsevier
Issue Date: 2016
ISSN: 1071-9164
1532-8414
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Prateeti Khazanie Bradley G. Hammill, Chetan B. Patel, Michael S. Kiernan, Lauren B. Cooper, Suzanne V. Arnold, Timothy J. Fendler, John A. Spertus, Lesley H. Curtis, Adrian F. Hernandez
Abstract: Background: Use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for treatment of advanced heart failure has expanded significantly over the past decade. However, concomitant use of heart failure medical therapies after implant is poorly characterized. Methods and Results: We examined the use of heart failure medications before and after LVAD implant in adult patients enrolled in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) between 2008 and 2013 (N = 9359). Using logistic regression, we examined relationships between patient characteristics and medication use at 3 months after implant. Baseline rates of heart failure therapies before implant were 38% for angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), 55% for β-blockers, 40% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), 87% for loop diuretics, 54% for amiodarone, 11% for phosphodiesterase inhibitors, 22% for warfarin, and 54% for antiplatelet agents. By 3 months after implant, the rates were 50% for ACE inhibitors or ARBs, 68% for β-blockers, 33% for MRAs, 68% for loop diuretics, 42% for amiodarone, 21% for phosphodiesterase inhibitors, 92% for warfarin, and 84% for antiplatelet agents. In general, age, preimplant INTERMACS profile, and prior medication use were associated with medication use at 3 months. Conclusions: Overall use of neurohormonal antagonists was low after LVAD implant, whereas use of loop diuretics and amiodarone remained high. Heart failure medication use is highly variable, but appears to generally increase after LVAD implantation. Low neurohormonal antagonist use may reflect practice uncertainty in the clinical utility of these medications post-LVAD.
Keywords: Heart-assist devices; Heart failure; Outcome and process assessment (health care)
Rights: © 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.02.004
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.02.004
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.