Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/132582
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Variation in Provision of Collaborative Medication Reviews on Entry to Long-Term Care Facilities
Author: Sluggett, J.K.
Bell, J.S.
Lang, C.
Corlis, M.
Whitehead, C.
Wesselingh, S.L.
Inacio, M.C.
Citation: Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (JAMDA): long-term care: management, applied research and clinical issues, 2020; 22(1):148-155.e1
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Issue Date: 2020
ISSN: 1525-8610
1538-9375
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Janet K. Sluggett, J. Simon Bell, Catherine Lang, Megan Corlis, Craig Whitehead, Steve L. Wesselingh, Maria C. Inacio
Abstract: Objectives: Residential medication management reviews (RMMRs) are comprehensive medication reviews conducted by clinical pharmacists and general medical practitioners. RMMRs are the primary government-funded service to optimize medication management in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs) and are recommended for all new residents. This study investigated resident characteristics associated with timely RMMR provision within 90 days of RACF entry and national intrafacility variation in timely RMMR provision. Design: National retrospective cohort study. Setting and participants: Individuals aged ≥65 years who first entered permanent residential aged care in Australia between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, received at least 1 medication in the previous year, and were alive at 90 days post-RACF entry. Methods: Resident characteristics associated with timely RMMR provision were determined using multivariate logistic regression. Crude and risk-adjusted funnel plots were used to examine intrafacility variation in timely RMMR provision. Results: Of the 143,676 residents from 2799 RACFs included, 30,883 (21.5%) received an RMMR within 90 days. Resident characteristics associated with timely provision included dementia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.08), primary language other than English (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.09), number of unique prescriptions dispensed in the previous year (aOR [per additional 5 prescriptions] 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03), need for medication administration assistance (aORs ranged from 1.35 to 1.42, compared with residents self-managing) and facility remoteness (aORs ranged from 0.67 to 0.75 for residents outside major cities). The proportion of new residents receiving a timely RMMR ranged from 0% (n = 303 RACFs) to 100% (n = 4 RACFs). There were 174 RACFs (6.2%) in which ≥50% of new residents received a timely RMMR. Conclusions and implications: Although there was some evidence that RMMRs are targeted to individuals with a greater burden of medication use and those living with dementia, considerable variation in provision exists nationally. This flagship medication review service is generally underutilized among residents of Australian RACFs.
Keywords: Medication review
medication management
long-term care
nursing homes
residential aged care
Australia
Rights: © 2020 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.027
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/APP1156439
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/APP1140298
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.027
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.