Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/132225
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Recommendations for core outcome domain set for Whiplash-Associated Disorders (CATWAD)
Author: Chen, K.
Andersen, T.
Carroll, L.
Connelly, L.
Côté, P.
Curatolo, M.
Elliott, J.
Grant, G.
Jull, G.
Kasch, H.
MacDermid, J.
Malmström, E.-M.
Maujean, A.
McLean, S.A.
Nielsen, M.
Rebbeck, T.
Söderlund, A.
Sterling, J.
Treleaven, J.
Walton, D.M.
et al.
Citation: Clinical Journal of Pain, 2019; 35(9):727-736
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer
Issue Date: 2019
ISSN: 0749-8047
1536-5409
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Kenneth Chen, Tonny Andersen, Linda Carroll, Luke Connelly, Pierre Côté, Michele Curatolo, James Elliott, Genevieve Grant, Gwendolen Jull, Helge Kasch, PhD, Joy MacDermid, Eva-Maj Malmström, Annick Maujean, Samuel A. McLean, Mandy Nielsen, Trudy Rebbeck, Anne Söderlund, Joanna Sterling, Julia Treleaven, David M. Walton, Hans Westergren, and Michele Sterling
Abstract: Objective: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of treatments for Whiplash-associated Disorders (WAD) hinders effective data pooling and conclusions that can be drawn about the effectiveness of tested treatments. The aim of this study was to provide recommendations for core outcome domains that should be included in clinical trials of WAD. Materials and Methods: A 3-step process was used: (1) A list of potential core outcome domains were identified from the published literature. (2) Researchers, health care providers, patients, and insurance personnel participated and rated the importance of each domain via a 3-round Delphi survey. A priori criteria for consensus were established. (3) Experts comprising researchers, health care providers, and a consumer representative participated in a multidisciplinary consensus meeting that made final decisions on the recommended core outcome domains. Results: The literature search identified 63 potential core domains. A total of 223 participants were invited to partake in the Delphi surveys, with 41.7% completing round 1, 45.3% round 2, and 51.4% round 3. Eleven core domains met the criteria for inclusion across the entire sample. After the expert consensus meeting, 6 core domains were recommended: Physical Functioning, Perceived Recovery, Work and Social Functioning, Psychological Functioning, Quality of Life, and Pain. Discussion: A 3-step process was used to recommend core outcome domains for clinical trials in WAD. Six core domains were recommended: Physical Functioning, Perceived Recovery, Work and Social Functioning, Psychological Functioning, Quality of Life, and Pain. The next step is to determine the outcome measurement instruments for each of these domains.
Keywords: Whiplash; outcome; domains; neck; pain
Rights: © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000735
Grant ID: NHMRC
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0000000000000735
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.