Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/10508
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLu, C.-
dc.contributor.authorWatson, D.-
dc.contributor.authorElias, T.-
dc.contributor.authorFaull, R.-
dc.contributor.authorClarkson, A.-
dc.contributor.authorBannister, K.-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationANZ Journal of Surgery, 2003; 73(3):109-111-
dc.identifier.issn1445-1433-
dc.identifier.issn1445-2197-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/10508-
dc.descriptionJournal compilation © 2009 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons-
dc.description.abstract<h4>Background</h4>Since 1994 we have placed all peritoneal dialysis (Tenckhoff) catheters at our hospital laparoscopically using a technique that incorporates suture fixation into the pelvis. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcome of this approach.<h4>Method</h4>Perioperative and follow-up data for all patients undergoing placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter at the Royal Adelaide Hospital were collected prospectively and managed on unit specific and hospital wide computerized databases. A total of 148 procedures were carried out in 123 patients from March 1994 to November 2001. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 68 months (median, 42 months). All procedures were undertaken or supervised by one surgeon, and catheters were routinely sutured into the pelvis at laparoscopy.<h4>Results</h4>There was no perioperative mortality in this series, and only one catheter could not be placed laparoscopically. This was in a patient with extensive intra-abdominal adhesions. Mean operative time was 27 min (range, 10-100 min), and mean postoperative stay was 2.8 days (range, 1-12 days). Seven (5%) patients experienced peri/postoperative haemorrhage, and four of these underwent surgical re-exploration. Twenty-five (17%) catheters are still used for dialysis. Thirty-four (23%) catheters were removed when the recipient received a subsequent renal transplant, and 42 (28%) patients died during follow-up. Forty-six (31%) patients required catheter revision or removal because of technical problems; 26 (18%) recurrent peritonitis or exit site infection; and 20 (14%) catheter blockage. Twenty-eight reinsertion procedures were carried out in 25 patients. Ten (7%) patients developed port site hernias at late follow-up, and required hernioplasty. Catheter migration leading to malfunction (poor drainage) occurred in eight (5%) patients only.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters is a safe and effective procedure. The majority of patients will dialyse successfully using this technique. Suturing the catheter tip into the pelvis is associated with a low rate of catheter migration.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityCu T. Lu, David I. Watson, Tony J. Elias, Randall J. Faull, Anthony R. Clarkson and Kym M. Bannister-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Asia-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02651.x-
dc.subjectPelvis-
dc.subjectUterus-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectKidney Failure, Chronic-
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications-
dc.subjectLaparoscopy-
dc.subjectPeritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory-
dc.subjectSuture Techniques-
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subjectCatheters, Indwelling-
dc.subjectTime Factors-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectUrinary Bladder-
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment, Health Care-
dc.titleLaparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: 7 years experience-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.provenancePublished Online: 14 Mar 2003-
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02651.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Surgery publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.