Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/98594
Type: Conference paper
Title: Proposed vehicle impact speed - severe injury probability relationships for selected crash types
Author: Jurewicz, C.
Sobhani, A.
Woolley, J.
Dutschke, J.
Corben, B.
Citation: Proceedings of the 2015 Australasian Road Safety Conference, 2015, pp.1-11
Publisher: Australasian College of Road Safety
Issue Date: 2015
Conference Name: Australasian Road Safety Conference (ACRS) (14 Oct 2015 - 16 Oct 2015 : Gold Coast, Qld)
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Chris Jurewicz, Dr Amir Sobhani, Dr Jeremy Woolley, Dr Jeff Dutschke, Dr Bruce Corben
Abstract: Speed is recognised as a key contributor to crash likelihood and severity, and to road safety performance in general. Its fundamental role has been recognised by making Safe Speeds one of the four pillars of the Safe System. In this context, impact speeds above which humans are likely to sustain fatal injuries have been accepted as a reference in many Safe System infrastructure policy and planning discussions. To date, there have been no proposed relationships for impact speeds above which humans are likely to sustain fatal or serious (severe) injury, a more relevant Safe System measure. A research project on Safe System intersection design required a critical review of published literature on the relationship between impact speed and probability of injury. This has led to a number of questions being raised about the origins, accuracy and appropriateness of the currently accepted impact speed–fatality probability relationships (Wramborg 2005) in many policy documents. The literature review identified alternative, more recent and more precise relationships derived from the US crash reconstruction databases (NASS/CDS). The paper proposes for discussion a set of alternative relationships between vehicle impact speed and probability of MAIS3+ (fatal and serious) injury for selected common crash types. Proposed Safe System critical impact speed values are also proposed for use in road infrastructure assessment. The paper presents the methodology and assumptions used in developing these relationships. It identifies further research needed to confirm and refine these relationships. Such relationships would form valuable inputs into future road safety policies in Australia and New Zealand.
Rights: Copyright: Authors retain copyright of papers presented at the Australasian College of Road Safety Conferences.
Published version: http://papers.acrs.org.au/index.cfm?action=main.paper&id=668
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Centre for Automotive Safety Research conference papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_98594.pdfPublished version539.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.