Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential
Author: Pitcher, J.
Doeltgen, S.
Goldsworthy, M.
Schneider, L.
Vallence, A.
Smith, A.
Semmler, J.
McDonnell, M.
Ridding, M.
Citation: Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015; 126(12):2337-2341
Publisher: Elsevier Ireland
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 1388-2457
Statement of
Julia B. Pitcher, Sebastian H. Doeltgen, Mitchell R. Goldsworthy, Luke A. Schneider, Ann-Maree Vallence, Ashleigh E. Smith, John G. Semmler, Michelle N. McDonnell, Michael C. Ridding
Abstract: Abstract not available
Keywords: Corticomotor stimulus–response curves; Resting motor threshold; Ageing; Children; Motor evoked potential; First dorsal interosseous
Rights: © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Paediatrics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.