Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/97413
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZotti, M.-
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, D.-
dc.contributor.authorWoodman, R.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Arthroplasty, 2014; 29(4):736-741-
dc.identifier.issn0883-5403-
dc.identifier.issn1532-8406-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/97413-
dc.description.abstractAbstract not available-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMario G.T. Zotti, David G. Campbell, Richard Woodman-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rights© 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.006-
dc.subjectosteolysis-
dc.subjectdetection-
dc.subjectdigital-
dc.subjectfilm-
dc.subjectdiagnostic-
dc.titleDigital imaging is not superior to film-screen imaging for the detection of periprosthetic osteolysis around total knee arthroplasties-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.006-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidCampbell, D. [0000-0002-1572-9529]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Orthopaedics and Trauma publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.