Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/92658
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRanasinghe, R.-
dc.contributor.authorHertz, T.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Economic Development, 2008; 33(2):107-124-
dc.identifier.issn0254-8372-
dc.identifier.issn0254-8372-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/92658-
dc.description.abstractThere is a continuing debate about the size and direction of the bias in estimates of returns to education. Evidence from developing countries is particularly scarce. This paper addresses the problem of measurement error bias in returns to schooling for Sri Lanka, by exploiting dual measurements of reported schooling for a sub-sample of the data and deriving a reliability estimate of schooling. This is used to obtain measurement error corrected fixed effects estimates of the proportionate increase associated with an additional level of schooling. This corrected measure is 5.5%, which is less than the OLS estimate of 7.8% for two person households.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityRasika Ranasinghe and Thomas Hertz-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherEconomic Research Institute of Chung-Ang University (Korea)-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.source.urihttp://www.jed.or.kr/full-text/33-2/5.pdf-
dc.subjectRate of Return-
dc.subjectEconomic Development-
dc.subjectEducational Economics-
dc.subjectHuman Capital-
dc.titleMeasurement error bias in returns to education: evidence from a developing country - Sri Lanka-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Australian Institute for Social Research publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.