Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/92333
Type: Thesis
Title: Water balance and the influence of temporal factors on final covers for landfill closure.
Author: Salt, Melissa R.
Issue Date: 2013
School/Discipline: School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering
Abstract: Final covers for landfill have consisted of engineered barriers to prevent contact with the underlying waste, limit the generation of leachate and emission of landfill gas. The theory for cover design has predominantly relied on attempting to prevent moisture from draining into the waste by placing an impermeable or low conductivity barrier, often as compacted clay or more recently as geotextile or geocomposite layers (GCL). However, studies overseas over the last 10 – 15 years have shown that these barrier layers, particularly compacted clay barriers, may not perform as expected. Increasingly, interest has been focussed on designing covers that maximise evapotranspiration as this release to the atmosphere does not have other detrimental implications. In 2006, the Waste Management Association of Australia and the Australian Research Council co-funded collaborative research between 5 Australian Universities to research the performance of compacted clay barriers and the emerging technology of phytocaps (also known as ET (evapotranspiration), alternate or store-and-release covers). This PhD is part of this collaborative research and aimed to: quantify drainage from phytocaps and conventional caps; compare water balance performance of conventional caps, including a compacted clay barrier, and phytocaps under a range of climatic, soil and vegetation conditions; and assess the temporal changes in the covers. The trial methodology was based on field-scale lysimetry with phytocaps trialled in 5 Australian States. All test sections were constructed on previously landfilled cells and included a 10 m x 20 m lysimeter instrumented to measure weather, runoff, lateral flow (compacted clay sections only), drainage and soil moisture content. An adjacent control section without a liner to bound the area was also instrumented to provide an assessment of the impact of the lysimeter liner on the water balance. At 3 trial sites, the research included side-by-side comparison of a conventional compacted clay barrier cap and a phytocap. Data collection at the sites has been undertaken for 3 – 4 years. The climate at the trial sites varies from summer-dominant rainfall in a tropical climate to sub-tropical and temperate climates with all-year rainfall and to temperate climates with hot, dry summers. The soil varied from alluvial loam and basaltic-derived clayey loam to coarse loamy sand. At one site, municipal waste compost was added to the available sandy loam. The vegetation has also varied between the sites from dominantly tree-based vegetation to only native grasses. The research has found that phytocaps have the potential to reduce drainage to the same extent as conventional caps. Also, the short term data collected indicate that phytocaps are likely to be more sustainable in the longer term as the changes in the soil moisture content range over the trial timeframe tended to be beneficial in the phytocap, with increased soil storage as the plant roots developed, and detrimental in the conventional cap, with cracking and preferential flow paths developed in the compacted clay barrier. The phytocap also has greater potential for its performance to be easily improved (e.g. increasing plant density, changing plant species, adding soil ameliorants) when compared with compacted clay barriers. The drainage measured in both the phytocap and conventional caps was strongly influenced by the seasonal precipitation and the seasonality of precipitation. Long-term research is needed to confirm the findings herein and provide a better understanding of the impact of structural changes in the phytocap and improve the prediction of phytocaps in a wider range of Australian climates.
Advisor: Jaksa, Mark Brian
Cox, Jim
Lightbody, Paul
Dissertation Note: Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, 2013
Keywords: landfill; phytocap; compacted clay barrier; A-ACAP; Australia; lysimeter; closure; post-closure
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf344.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf7.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
PermissionsLibrary staff access only293.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
RestrictedLibrary staff access only6.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.