Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/87851
Type: Thesis
Title: Crop residue phosphorus: speciation and release in cropping soils.
Author: Noack, Sarah Ruth
Issue Date: 2014
School/Discipline: School of Agriculture, Food and Wine
Abstract: Crop residues remaining after grain harvest are an important potential source of nutrients, including phosphorus (P), to the cropping system. Crop residues contain both inorganic and organic forms of P and these forms may take different pathways into soil P pools. The rate and quantity of residue P released depends partly on the specific P compounds in the residues. The most commonly used measure of P in crop residues is total P, followed by separate measurement of inorganic P and organic P. These measures do not speciate residue P into specific compounds and consequently, residue P dynamics in soils remains poorly understood. This thesis characterises P contained in crop residues using solution ³¹P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and compares this technique with conventional chemical fractionation methods. These initial analytical studies provided the basis for subsequent investigations of the effect of plant P status and residue management on release of residue P in a soil-plant system, leading to a better understanding of the potential bioavailability of residue P in soil. Inorganic and organic P forms were quantified using ³¹P NMR spectroscopy in different plant components (stem, chaff and seed) collected from field grown cereal and legume crops. The main forms of P detected in stem and chaff were orthophosphate (35-75%) and the easily degradable organic P forms, phospholipids (10-40%) and RNA (5-30%). The majority (65-90%) of P in stems was water-extractable, and most of this was detected as orthophosphate. This indicated that the majority of residue P in aboveground plant residues has the potential to be delivered to soil in a form readily available to plants and soil microorganisms. An integrated approach combining spectroscopic techniques with chemical extraction assisted with verifying assumptions made when using chemical fractionation methods. The main assumptions investigated were; the selectivity of chemical extractants for a single P species, the ability of the extractant to bring all of the P form into solution, and to examine if other P species were released into solution or if the P speciation was changed with extraction. The results showed that the orthophosphate concentration in water/acid extracts was increased due to the hydrolysis of pyrophosphate and organic P species, but decreased due to incomplete recovery of orthophosphate from the crop residues. These effects largely cancelled each other out. Treatments widely used to extract phospholipid (extraction with ethanol:ether and ethanol:ether:chloroform), were found to be selective for phospholipid P, but were quite ineffective, with only ~10% of the phospholipid P determined by solution ³¹P NMR extracted in each case. These results strongly suggest that speciation of crop residue P using chemical fractionation can be compromised by the incomplete recovery of a given P species and the transformation of other P species during extraction. As plants approach maturity and start to senesce, the primary sink for phosphorus is the seed but it is unclear how plant P status affects the resulting P concentration and speciation in the seed and remaining plant parts, i.e. the residues. Wheat and canola grown in the glasshouse were supplied three different P rates (5, 30 and 60 kg P ha⁻¹ equivalent) designed to represent deficient, adequate and luxury levels of P. The speciation of P in roots, stem, leaves, chaff/pod and grain was examined. Stems and leaves, which contribute the bulk of post-harvest residue P, were dominated by orthophosphate, regardless of plant P status. Minor differences were observed in P speciation across the three P application rates and plant parts. The effect of this on P cycling is likely to be relatively minor in comparison to the overall contribution of these residues to soil P pools. Release of nutrients, including P from crop residues remaining post-harvest is an important potential source of nutrients for subsequent crops. The effect of residue size and placement of field-collected pea residue on subsequent P uptake by wheat, soil hexanol-released P and resin-extractable P was measured in a glasshouse experiment. On average, > 50% of residue P was detected in plant, microbial and resin P pools when incorporated in soil compared to 20% for the two surface-placed residue treatments. When considering how residue management strategies may influence P supply to crops, incorporating residues will increase the rate of release and decomposition and therefore the potential for plant roots (if present) to access this P. The results also indicate that even though residue P takes longer to break down under no-till management, this system will still provide small but agronomically significant amounts of P to subsequent crops.
Advisor: McLaughlin, Michael John
Smernik, Ronald Josef
McBeath, Therese Marie
Armstrong, Roger D.
Dissertation Note: Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, 2014
Keywords: phosphorus; crop residues; speciation; plant P status; residue management
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf85.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf2.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
PermissionsLibrary staff access only729.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
RestrictedLibrary staff access only2.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.