Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/82976
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, T.-
dc.contributor.authorKitson, A.-
dc.contributor.authorSoenen, S.-
dc.contributor.authorLong, L.-
dc.contributor.authorShanks, A.-
dc.contributor.authorWiechula, R.-
dc.contributor.authorChapman, I.-
dc.contributor.authorLange, K.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citatione-SPEN Journal: the European e-journal of clinical nutrition and metabolism, 2014; 9(2):284-e90-
dc.identifier.issn2212-8263-
dc.identifier.issn2212-8263-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/82976-
dc.description.abstractBackground & aims: The effectiveness of combining interventions (nutrition screening, provision of oral nutritional supplements, and flagging patients for feeding assistance) in preventing nutritional decline is unknown. Methods: We conducted a stepped wedge, randomised, cluster trial to evaluate a multifaceted nutritional intervention implemented across a metropolitan hospital. Change in body weight after the first, and second, week of stay; use of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST); and requests for feeding assistance for patients were measured across control (n=135) and intervention (n=240) time periods. Results: In the first week, patients lost 0.4??3.3% of their body mass, equivalent to 0.4??2.3kg and a reduction in body mass index (BMI) of 0.1??0.8kg/m2. Unadjusted analysis identified some reductions in nutritional decline in the intervention group, particularly in week 2 when 14% of patients in the intervention group experienced weight loss, compared to 33% of control patients (P=0.053).In week 1, significantly more intervention patients had a completed MUST (201/238, 84.5%, P=0.000) and a feeding assistance referral (48/240, 20%, P=0.004). 'At risk' patients with BMI <20 gained 0.6??4.4% of their body mass. Multivariable analysis of week 1 data found no relationship between weight loss outcomes and the treatment, the ward or time period. Conclusions: Weight loss after one week did not differ between control and intervention wards. Implementation of a multifaceted intervention was facilitated by the study design, however, the study reinforced difficulties in accurately weighing patients in hospital.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityTimothy J. Schultz, Alison L. Kitson, Stijn Soenen, Leslye Long, Alison Shanks, Rick Wiechula, Ian Chapman, Kylie Lange-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rights© 2014 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnme.2014.01.002-
dc.subjectStepped wedge; Knowledge translation; Nutritional screening; Oral nutritional supplement; Feeding assistance; Nutritional decline-
dc.titleDoes a multidisciplinary nutritional intervention prevent nutritional decline in hospital patients? A stepped wedge randomised cluster trial-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clnme.2014.01.002-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSchultz, T. [0000-0003-1419-3328]-
dc.identifier.orcidKitson, A. [0000-0003-3053-8381]-
dc.identifier.orcidSoenen, S. [0000-0002-0196-128X]-
dc.identifier.orcidWiechula, R. [0000-0003-1351-5612]-
dc.identifier.orcidLange, K. [0000-0003-3814-8513]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Nursing publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.