Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/82021
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDorstyn, D.-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, R.-
dc.contributor.authorKneebone, I.-
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, P.-
dc.contributor.authorLieu, C.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2014; 21(1):40-51-
dc.identifier.issn1074-9357-
dc.identifier.issn1945-5119-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/82021-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that the incorporation of leisure activities in adult stroke rehabilitation can contribute to improved physical, cognitive, and psychological outcomes. However, differences in study design and treatment delivery may affect these findings. Furthermore, the magnitude of therapeutic change associated with leisure therapy is unclear, with few quantitative reviews available. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and evaluate the empirical evidence examining leisure therapy in stroke rehabilitation. METHODS: Eight independent studies (N = 615 participants) were identified from a comprehensive database search. Study quality was evaluated using the Oxford Levels of Evidence. Pre- and post-treatment data for participants who received leisure therapy, in comparison with peers who received standard care or no treatment, were evaluated by calculating Cohen’s d effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: No studies met the criteria for the highest level of methodological rigor, although all used randomization procedures. Leisure therapy contributed to significant short-term improvements in psychological outcomes, namely quality of life and mood (d range, 2.10 to 0.54), in addition to leisure-specific outcomes, including increased participation in and satisfaction with leisure activities (d range, 0.81 to 1.23). Longer term effects of treatment could not be determined, with one study providing data and reporting nonsignificant effects (d range, −0.07 to 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that leisure therapy offers an opportunity to enhance short-term treatment gains in community-based stroke rehabilitation. Further controlled research is needed to establish its longer term effects and assist the development of evidence-based guidelines for this treatment.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityD. Dorstyn, R. Roberts, I. Kneebone, P. Kennedy, and C. Lieu-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherThomas Land Publishers-
dc.rights© 2013 Thomas Land Publishers, Inc.-
dc.subjectleisure activities-
dc.subjectoccupational therapy-
dc.subjectrecreation therapy-
dc.subjectrehabilitation-
dc.subjectstroke-
dc.subjectsystematic review-
dc.subjecttreatment outcome-
dc.titleSystematic review of leisure therapy and its effectiveness in managing functional outcomes in stroke rehabilitation-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Health Sciences-
dc.identifier.doi10.1310/tsr2101-40-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidDorstyn, D. [0000-0002-7799-8177]-
dc.identifier.orcidRoberts, R. [0000-0002-9547-9995]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.