Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/72134
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrook, B.-
dc.contributor.authorBradshaw, C.-
dc.contributor.authorTraill, L.-
dc.contributor.authorFrankham, R.-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 2011; 26(12):619-620-
dc.identifier.issn0169-5347-
dc.identifier.issn1872-8383-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/72134-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityBarry W. Brook, Corey J.A. Bradshaw, Lochran W. Traill and Richard Frankham-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier Science London-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.subjectRisk Assessment-
dc.subjectConservation of Natural Resources-
dc.subjectPopulation Density-
dc.subjectExtinction, Biological-
dc.titleMinimum viable population size: not magic, but necessary-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.006-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBradshaw, C. [0000-0002-5328-7741]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Earth and Environmental Sciences publications
Environment Institute Leaders publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.