Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Qualitative methods in early-phase drug trials: Broadening the scope of data and methods from an RCT of N-acetylcysteine in schizophrenia|
|Citation:||Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2011; 72(7):909-913|
|Publisher:||Physicians Postgraduate Press|
|Michael Berk, Ahmed Munib, Olivia Dean, Gin S. Malhi, Kristy Kohlmann, Ian Schapkaitz, Sue Jeavons, Fiona Katz, Murray Anderson-Hunt, Philippe Conus, Barbara Hanna, Renée Otmar, Felicity Ng, David L. Copolov, and Ashley I. Bush|
|Abstract:||OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetic profile of a drug often gives little indication of its potential therapeutic application, with many therapeutic uses of drugs being discovered serendipitously while being studied for different indications. As hypothesis-driven, quantitative research methodology is exclusively used in early-phase trials, unexpected but important phenomena may escape detection. In this context, this study aimed to examine the potential for integrating qualitative research methods with quantitative methods in early-phase drug trials. To our knowledge, this mixed methodology has not previously been applied to blinded psychopharmacologic trials. METHOD: We undertook qualitative data analysis of clinical observations on the dataset of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in patients with DSM-IV-TR-diagnosed schizophrenia (N = 140). Textual data on all participants, deliberately collected for this purpose, were coded using NVivo 2, and emergent themes were analyzed in a blinded manner in the NAC and placebo groups. The trial was conducted from November 2002 to July 2005. RESULTS: The principal findings of the published trial could be replicated using a qualitative methodology. In addition, significant differences between NAC- and placebo-treated participants emerged for positive and affective symptoms, which had not been captured by the rating scales utilized in the quantitative trial. Qualitative data in this study subsequently led to a positive trial of NAC in bipolar disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The use of qualitative methods may yield broader data and has the potential to complement traditional quantitative methods and detect unexpected efficacy and safety signals, thereby maximizing the findings of early-phase clinical trial research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12605000363684.|
|Keywords:||Humans; Acetylcysteine; Free Radical Scavengers; Data Collection; Double-Blind Method; Schizophrenia; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenic Psychology; Adult; Middle Aged; Female; Male|
|Rights:||© 2010 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.|
|Appears in Collections:||Psychiatry publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.