Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/6679
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of ScienceĀ® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | A Comparison of Different Surgical Approaches for the Periacetabular Osteotomy |
Author: | Hussell, G. Mast, J. Mayo, K. Howie, D. Reinhold, G. |
Citation: | Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1999; 363(363):64-72 |
Publisher: | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS |
Issue Date: | 1999 |
ISSN: | 0009-921X 1528-1132 |
Abstract: | The periacetabular osteotomy is a well established surgical procedure for the preventative treatment of degenerative joint disease caused by symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. Surgeons on several continents use varying surgical approaches to achieve the same effective osteotomy. Individual surgical approaches must provide accurate and adequate exposure for the osteotomy and the reorientation of the acetabular fragment. The aim of the surgical approach for such complex and expansive surgery is to minimize morbidity related to the approach. This article compares experiences among three common approaches including the modified Smith-Petersen, ilioinguinal, and direct anterior approaches and describes the double approach. |
Keywords: | Acetabulum Humans Osteoarthritis, Hip Hip Dislocation Treatment Outcome Osteotomy |
DOI: | 10.1097/00003086-199906000-00009 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199906000-00009 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Orthopaedics and Trauma publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.