Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/63860
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCrisp, Geoffrey Thomasen
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.citationAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012; 37(1):33–43en
dc.identifier.issn0260-2938en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/63860-
dc.descriptionPublished online: 26 Jul 2010en
dc.description.abstractThe requirement to provide timely formative tasks that are designed to facilitate student learning and autonomy has provoked a wider examination of the role of assessment in higher education and encouraged further investigation of the alignment of learning, teaching and assessment in curriculum design frameworks. Many current authors have proposed that the primary purpose of assessment is to enhance current and future learning and that current practice tends to overemphasise the importance of assessment for progression and certification purposes. This paper proposes that a clearer distinction be made between assessment tasks designed to facilitate and test current learning through the use of formative and summative assessments, and those tasks primarily designed to enhance future learning, which could be better termed integrative assessments. This distinction would allow students and teachers to have greater clarity around the proposed outcomes and reward mechanisms associated with assessment tasks and feedback. This paper proposes that teachers should strive to incorporate four different types of assessment tasks throughout a programme of study, namely diagnostic, formative, integrative and summative tasks, and that the outcomes and reward mechanisms for different assessment types be explained more clearly to students.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGeoffrey T. Crispen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCarfax Publishing Ltden
dc.rights© 2010 Taylor & Francisen
dc.subjectintegrative assessment; integration; assessment; curriculum designen
dc.titleIntegrative assessment: reframing assessment practice for current and future learningen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.schoolPro Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Quality)en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02602938.2010.494234en
Appears in Collections:Centre for Learning and Professional Development publications

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_63860.pdf
  Restricted Access
174.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.