Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Urodynamics or history? Clinical decision-making in women presenting with urinary incontinence|
|Citation:||Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010; 50(6):556-561|
|Publisher:||Blackwell Publishing Asia|
|Abstract:||Background: Preoperative urodynamic testing is recommended by experts, but evidence for clinical benefit is limited. Aims: To determine whether urodynamic stress incontinence could be confirmed in women presenting with a history of stress incontinence. Methods: History and urodynamic diagnoses of 444 women presenting to a general unit between June 2003 and July 2007 are described. Results: Urodynamic Stress Incontinence (USI) or mixed USI and detrusor overactivity were observed in 61% reporting any stress incontinence. 15% who reported no stress incontinence had USI. Compared with a normal urodynamic diagnosis, incontinence occurred more frequently in all other diagnostic categories (P < 0.0001) and was worst in the USI and mixed groups (P < 0.0004). Conclusions: Urodynamic Stress Incontinence is a more severe entity than stress incontinence diagnosed by history. It is yet to be established if this information benefits patients.|
|Rights:||© 2010 The Author. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2010 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest 5|
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.