Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/53784
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKrieg, A.-
dc.contributor.authorSpeth, B.-
dc.contributor.authorFoster, B.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008; 466(1):189-197-
dc.identifier.issn0009-921X-
dc.identifier.issn1528-1132-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/53784-
dc.descriptionThe original publication can be found at www.springerlink.com-
dc.description.abstractLeg lengthening by external fixation is associated with various difficulties. We evaluated eight adolescent patients who underwent leg lengthening with a motorized intramedullary lengthening device. We asked whether this method could reduce the time of hospitalization and rehabilitation and whether the incidence of complications commonly associated with external fixators could be reduced. We compared our preliminary results with those from other reports, with a focus on leg length achieved, time of rehabilitation, and rate of complications. The average leg-length discrepancy was 3.8 cm (range, 3–5 cm). The average lengthening distance was 3.8 cm (range, 2.9–4.7 cm). In six patients, leg lengthening was combined with successful correction of the mechanical axis alignment. The consolidation index averaged 26 days/cm (range, 19–41 days/cm). The average hospital stay was 9.6 days. No bone or soft tissue infections were observed. In comparison to other studies (1.0–2.8 complications/patient), our results suggest that the difficulties commonly associated with external fixators can be reduced with this method. It also allows good angular correction in patients with mechanical axis deviation. These features combined with a short time of hospitalization and rehabilitation make it a promising procedure for limb lengthening.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAndreas H. Krieg, Bernhard M. Speth and Bruce K. Foster-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0040-3-
dc.subjectTibia-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectLeg Length Inequality-
dc.subjectRadiography-
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome-
dc.subjectFracture Fixation, Intramedullary-
dc.subjectProspective Studies-
dc.subjectEquipment Design-
dc.subjectBone Nails-
dc.subjectInternal Fixators-
dc.subjectRecovery of Function-
dc.subjectAdolescent-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectElectric Power Supplies-
dc.titleLeg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11999-007-0040-3-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Orthopaedics and Trauma publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.