Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/52463
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilmshurst, J.-
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, A.-
dc.contributor.authorHigham, T.-
dc.contributor.authorWorthy, T.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 2008; 105(22):7676-7680-
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424-
dc.identifier.issn1091-6490-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/52463-
dc.description.abstractThe pristine island ecosystems of East Polynesia were among the last places on Earth settled by prehistoric people, and their colonization triggered a devastating transformation. Overhunting contributed to widespread faunal extinctions and the decline of marine megafauna, fires destroyed lowland forests, and the introduction of the omnivorous Pacific rat (Rattus exulans) led to a new wave of predation on the biota. East Polynesian islands preserve exceptionally detailed records of the initial prehistoric impacts on highly vulnerable ecosystems, but nearly all such studies are clouded by persistent controversies over the timing of initial human colonization, which has resulted in proposed settlement chronologies varying from approximately 200 B.C. to 1000 A.D. or younger. Such differences underpin radically divergent interpretations of human dispersal from West Polynesia and of ecological and social transformation in East Polynesia and ultimately obfuscate the timing and patterns of this process. Using New Zealand as an example, we provide a reliable approach for accurately dating initial human colonization on Pacific islands by radiocarbon dating the arrival of the Pacific rat. Radiocarbon dates on distinctive rat-gnawed seeds and rat bones show that the Pacific rat was introduced to both main islands of New Zealand approximately 1280 A.D., a millennium later than previously assumed. This matches with the earliest-dated archaeological sites, human-induced faunal extinctions, and deforestation, implying there was no long period of invisibility in either the archaeological or palaeoecological records.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJanet M. Wilmshurst, Atholl J. Anderson, Thomas F. G. Higham and Trevor H. Worthy-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherThe National Academy of Sciences of the USA-
dc.rights© 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801507105-
dc.subjectarchaeological visibility; colonization; East Polynesia; radiocarbon; Rattus exulans-
dc.titleDating the late prehistoric dispersal of Polynesians to New Zealand using the commensal Pacific rat-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.0801507105-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Australian Centre for Ancient DNA publications
Earth and Environmental Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.