Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/51200
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoberts-Thomson, K.-
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, I.-
dc.contributor.authorKistler, P.-
dc.contributor.authorHaqqani, H.-
dc.contributor.authorSpence, S.-
dc.contributor.authorGoldblatt, J.-
dc.contributor.authorSanders, P.-
dc.contributor.authorKalman, J.-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationHeart Rhythm, 2009; 6(8):1109-1117-
dc.identifier.issn1547-5271-
dc.identifier.issn1556-3871-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/51200-
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2009 Heart Rhythm Society-
dc.description.abstract<h4>Background</h4>The posterior left atrium (LA) is involved in the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF).<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this study was to compare conduction patterns on the posterior LA in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR), with and without AF.<h4>Methods</h4>Epicardial mapping of the posterior LA was performed in 23 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were included in one of three groups: Group A-patients in sinus rhythm with normal left ventricular function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, Group B-patients in sinus rhythm with MR undergoing mitral valve surgery, or Group C-patients in persistent AF with MR undergoing mitral valve surgery. Conduction patterns, regional conduction velocity, conduction heterogeneity, conduction anisotropy, and complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) were assessed.<h4>Results</h4>LA diameter was greater in patients in Groups C (57 +/- 4mm) and B (54 +/- 6mm) than in Group A (39 +/- 7 mm, P <0.01). Patients in Group C had a greater number of lines of conduction delay than Groups A and B (2.0 +/- 0.8 vs 1 +/- 0 and 1 +/- 0, P <0.05). The extent of conduction delay and conduction heterogeneity was greater in Group C than in Group B, which was greater than in Group A (P <0.05). The percentage of CFAEs that remained stable during AF was 61% +/- 17%. There was a significant correlation between CFAEs during AF and regions of slow conduction during pacing (R = 0.36, P <0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Patients with MR, LA enlargement, and AF have more extensive regions of conduction slowing in the posterior LA. Anatomically constant lines of conduction delay in this region lead to circuitous wavefront propagation. During persistent AF, fractionated electrograms in the posterior LA are distributed to regions demonstrating slow conduction, and the majority remain stable over time.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityKurt C. Roberts-Thomson, Irene Stevenson, Peter M. Kistler, Haris M. Haqqani, Steven J. Spence, John C. Goldblatt, Prashanthan Sanders and Jonathan M. Kalman-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.008-
dc.subjectAtrial fibrillation-
dc.subjectMitral regurgitation-
dc.subjectConduction delay-
dc.subjectPosterior left atrium-
dc.subjectAtrial stretch-
dc.titleThe role of chronic atrial stretch and atrial fibrillation on posterior left atrial wall conduction-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.008-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSanders, P. [0000-0003-3803-8429]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.