Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/47512
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, D.-
dc.contributor.authorZiersch, A.-
dc.contributor.authorBurgess, T.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationAustralia and New Zealand Health Policy, 2008; 5(20):1-11-
dc.identifier.issn1743-8462-
dc.identifier.issn1743-8462-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/47512-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Many refugees arrive in Australia with complex health needs. In South Australia (SA), providing initial health care to refugees is the responsibility of General Practitioners (GPs) in private practice. Their capacity to perform this work effectively for current newly arrived refugees is uncertain. The aim of this study was to document the challenges faced by GPs in private practice in SA when providing initial care to refugees and to discuss the implications of this for policy relating to optimising health care services for refugees. Methods Semi-structured interviews with twelve GPs in private practice and three Medical Directors of Divisions of General Practice. Using a template analysis approach the interviews were coded and analysed thematically. Results Multiple challenges providing care to refugees were found including those related to: (1) refugee health issues; (2) the GP-refugee interaction; and (3) the structure of general practice. The Divisions also reported challenges assisting GPs to provide effective care related to a lack of funding and awareness of which GPs required support. Although respondents suggested a number of ways that GPs could be assisted to provide better initial care to refugees, strong support was voiced for the initial care of refugees to be provided via a specialist refugee health service. Conclusion GPs in this study were under-resourced, at both an individual GP level as well as a structural level, to provide effective initial care for refugees. In SA, there are likely to be a number of challenges attempting to increase the capacity of GPs in private practice to provide initial care. An alternative model is for refugees with multiple and complex health care needs as well as those with significant resettlement challenges to receive initial health care via the existing specialist refugee health service in Adelaide.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDavid R Johnson, Anna M Ziersch, Teresa Burgess-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.rights© 2008 Johnson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.source.urihttp://www.anzhealthpolicy.com/content/5/1/20-
dc.title'I don't think general practice should be the front line': experiences of general practitioners working with refugees in South Australia-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.provenanceThis Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Publication date 8 August 2008.-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1743-8462-5-20-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBurgess, T. [0000-0003-0725-8672]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_47512.pdfPublished version524.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.