Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/36450
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Testing Holland's Hexagon: Explanation and Criticism |
Author: | Hutchinson, T. Myors, B. |
Citation: | Quality and Quantity: international journal of methodology, 2001; 35(4):343-349 |
Publisher: | Kluwer Academic Publ |
Issue Date: | 2001 |
ISSN: | 0033-5177 |
Statement of Responsibility: | T.P. Hutchinson and B. Myors |
Abstract: | A description is given of Hubert and Arabie's test of whether an empirical matrix of correlations (between the six measures of vocational interests commonly abbreviated R, I, A, S, E, and C) supports Holland's hexagonal (circular order) model. The description makes clear that the test has severelimitations. Specifically, the circular ordering RIASEC is onlycompared with other circular orderings. Consequently, correlationmatrices arising from a model that is qualitatively different may berated very highly by Hubert and Arabie's test; several examples ofthis are given. |
Keywords: | Hubert and Arabie's test personality structure RIASEC hexagon vocational interests |
Rights: | © Springer |
DOI: | 10.1023/A:1012238500192 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1012238500192 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Centre for Automotive Safety Research publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.