Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/36450
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Testing Holland's Hexagon: Explanation and Criticism
Author: Hutchinson, T.
Myors, B.
Citation: Quality and Quantity: international journal of methodology, 2001; 35(4):343-349
Publisher: Kluwer Academic Publ
Issue Date: 2001
ISSN: 0033-5177
Statement of
Responsibility: 
T.P. Hutchinson and B. Myors
Abstract: A description is given of Hubert and Arabie's test of whether an empirical matrix of correlations (between the six measures of vocational interests commonly abbreviated R, I, A, S, E, and C) supports Holland's hexagonal (circular order) model. The description makes clear that the test has severelimitations. Specifically, the circular ordering RIASEC is onlycompared with other circular orderings. Consequently, correlationmatrices arising from a model that is qualitatively different may berated very highly by Hubert and Arabie's test; several examples ofthis are given.
Keywords: Hubert and Arabie's test
personality structure
RIASEC hexagon
vocational interests
Rights: © Springer
DOI: 10.1023/A:1012238500192
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1012238500192
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Centre for Automotive Safety Research publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.