Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/36140
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSutton, P.-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Aboriginal Studies, 2005; 2:35-43-
dc.identifier.issn0729-4352-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/36140-
dc.description.abstractIn 2003 Gillian Cowlishaw published a confrontational attack on a paper that I had published earlier on the subject of 'The politics of suffering' in Aboriginal Australia. While this reply takes up and answers her main points, it also examines her writings more generally and comes to a critical view of the use of the anthropological literary framework in the pursuit of political ends. The politicisation of anthropological and historical writing on Indigenous themes in recent decades has focused unwarranted attention on the moral position of the author, and has been running in reverse gear against the long-term trend of secularisation and objectification encouraged in Western thought since the Enlightenment. I suggest it's time for a little classicism.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPeter Sutton-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAustralian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2005 Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies-
dc.source.urihttp://www.aiatsis.gov.au/asj/docs/Sutton_AAS0205.pdf-
dc.titleRage, reason and the honourable cause: a reply to Cowlishaw-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSutton, P. [0000-0002-1195-4171]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Earth and Environmental Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.