Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
Full metadata record
|dc.contributor.author||Lane, Marcus B.||en|
|dc.identifier.citation||Australian Geographer, 2005; 36(3):283-299||en|
|dc.description.abstract||This paper tracks the changing role of public participation in planning thought. In doing so, the paper shows that the role of public participation in planning is largely determined by the nature of the planning enterprise being undertaken. The definition of the planning problem, the kinds of knowledge used in planning practice, and the conceptualisation of the planning and decision-making context are the important determinants of the extent of participation offered to the public. The paper therefore contributes to thinking about how to evaluate public participation by showing that it can only be understood in terms of the decision-making context in which it is embedded. Specifically, it makes little sense to evaluate public participation in terms that are not shared by the planning model itself.||en|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||Marcus B. Lane||en|
|dc.rights||© 2005 Geographical Society of New South Wales Inc||en|
|dc.subject||Planning; economic policy; central planning; decision making; political science||en|
|dc.title||Public participation in planning: an intellectual history||en|
|dc.contributor.school||School of Social Sciences : Geographical and Environmental Studies||en|
|Appears in Collections:||Geography, Environment and Population publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.