Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/137231
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Utopia versus dystopia: Professional perspectives on the impact of healthcare artificial intelligence on clinical roles and skills
Author: Aquino, Y.S.J.
Rogers, W.A.
Braunack-Mayer, A.
Frazer, H.
Win, K.T.
Houssami, N.
Degeling, C.
Semsarian, C.
Carter, S.M.
Citation: International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2023; 169:104903-1-104903-10
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Issue Date: 2023
ISSN: 1386-5056
1872-8243
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Yves Saint James Aquino, Wendy A. Rogers, Annette Braunack-Mayer, Helen Frazer, Khin Than Win, Nehmat Houssami, Christopher Degeling, Christopher Semsarian, Stacy M. Carter
Abstract: Background: Alongside the promise of improving clinical work, advances in healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) raise concerns about the risk of deskilling clinicians. This purpose of this study is to examine the issue of deskilling from the perspective of diverse group of professional stakeholders with knowledge and/or experiences in the development, deployment and regulation of healthcare AI. Methods: We conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 72 professionals with AI expertise and/or professional or clinical expertise who were involved in development, deployment and/or regulation of healthcare AI. Data analysis using combined constructivist grounded theory and framework approach was performed concurrently with data collection. Findings: Our analysis showed participants had diverse views on three contentious issues regarding AI and deskilling. The first involved competing views about the proper extent of AI-enabled automation in healthcare work, and which clinical tasks should or should not be automated. We identified a cluster of characteristics of tasks that were considered more suitable for automation. The second involved expectations about the impact of AI on clinical skills, and whether AI-enabled automation would lead to worse or better quality of healthcare. The third tension implicitly contrasted two models of healthcare work: a human-centric model and a technologycentric model. These models assumed different values and priorities for healthcare work and its relationship to AI-enabled automation. Conclusion: Our study shows that a diverse group of professional stakeholders involved in healthcare AI development, acquisition, deployment and regulation are attentive to the potential impact of healthcare AI on clinical skills, but have different views about the nature and valence (positive or negative) of this impact. Detailed engagement with different types of professional stakeholders allowed us to identify relevant concepts and values that could guide decisions about AI algorithm development and deployment.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Medicine; Healthcare; Ethics; Clinical Skills; Automation
Rights: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104903
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1181960
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104903
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_137231.pdfPublished version811.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.