Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/133187
Type: Thesis
Title: The Two Factors of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: Method Effects, Gender Differences, and a Novel Factor Structure
Author: Butler, Corbin L
Issue Date: 2021
School/Discipline: School of Psychology
Abstract: The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (version 11; BIS-11) is a widely used self-report scale of impulsivity. However, many studies have failed to support the three-factor model proposed by the authors of the scale and have instead found a two-factor model in which forward- and reverse-scored items load on separate factors. The two factors have been interpreted as substantive constructs and adopted as alternative scoring schemes in many studies. The present study investigated the factor structure of the BIS-11 and BIS-Brief (an eight-item short form of the BIS-11) in a sample of 232 adults. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the BIS-Brief resulted in a novel two-factor model with a good fit, and this fit was notably improved when the analysis was conducted for women only. A second EFA included BIS-Brief items that were rephrased using linguistic negation and scored in the opposite direction. These items loaded alongside their original counterparts, indicating that the novel factor model is substantive and unrelated to item scoring direction. However, the addition of six simulated careless respondents to the sample resulted in the emergence of a two-factor model reflecting item scoring direction. These results suggest that the BIS-Brief is best described by a novel two-factor model, but this model only applies to women, and it is easily compromised by a small number of careless respondents. Therefore, it is recommended that future research use only the total score of the BIS-Brief.
Dissertation Note: Thesis (B.PsychSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2021
Keywords: Honours; Psychology
Description: This item is only available electronically.
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Appears in Collections:School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ButlerCL_2021_Hons.pdf678.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.