Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPearson, Simon Gerald-
dc.descriptionThis item is only available electronically.en
dc.description.abstractHamstring injuries (HSI) are the cause of the highest number of games missed through injury in the AFL each year (16.6 matches per club). Recurrence rates are also high, at about 14%, with both of these figures remaining stable over the last ten years, causing significant economic and performance-based challenges. To date, most research has focused on the physical, rather than psychological, factors related to HSI. In sports injury research, the topic of ACL injury has received most research attention from a psychological perspective. Athletes' fear of re-injury has been found to be a significant predictor of return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes following ACL injury, and ‘psychological readiness' has been found to be the best predictor of RTS outcomes one-year following ACL surgery. The current exploratory qualitative study aimed to examine the nature of athletes' experiences of, and sense-making around, injury to their hamstring, with a focus on three phases: injury response, rehabilitation and return to sport. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 athletes from AFL clubs in two states. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data, with two main themes identified: (1) When to stop, when to go - Players responses to hamstring injury and (2) Trust - The club has my back. The first theme describes players’ interpretations of pain and fear throughout the injury experience. The second theme discusses the central role that the medical team has in player experiences, both around injury understanding, but also throughout the rehabilitation and return-to-sport phase. Recommendations for future research are discussed.en
dc.subjectHonours; Psychologyen
dc.titleAustralian Football League (AFL) Players’ Experiences of, and Sense-Making around Injury to their Hamstringen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Psychology-
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at:
dc.description.dissertationThesis (B.PsychSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2018-
Appears in Collections:School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PearsonSG_2018_Hons.pdf1.71 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.