Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/115827
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRatcliffe, J.en
dc.contributor.authorLancsar, E.en
dc.contributor.authorFlint, T.en
dc.contributor.authorKaambwa, B.en
dc.contributor.authorWalker, R.en
dc.contributor.authorLewin, G.en
dc.contributor.authorLuszcz, M.en
dc.contributor.authorCameron, I.en
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationQuality of Life Research, 2017; 26(2):299-309en
dc.identifier.issn0962-9343en
dc.identifier.issn1573-2649en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/115827-
dc.descriptionPublished online: 23 August 2016en
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To systematically compare, via ranking and best worst tasks, the relative importance of key dimensions of quality of life for younger and older people. Methods: A web-based survey was developed for administration to two Australia-wide community-based samples comprising younger people aged 18–64 years and older people aged 65 years and above. Respondents were asked to rank 12 quality of life dimensions. Respondents also completed a successive best worst task using the same 12 quality of life dimensions. Results: The relative importance of the quality of life dimensions differed for younger and older person samples. For older people, the ability to be independent and to have control over their daily lives were particularly important for their overall quality of life whereas for younger people, mental health was considered most important. Conclusions: Many interventions accessed by older people in geriatric medicine and aged care sectors have a broader impact upon quality of life beyond health status. The findings from this study indicate that a focus on broader aspects of quality of life may also be consistent with the preferences of older people themselves as to what constitutes quality of life from their perspective.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJulie Ratcliffe, Emily Lancsar, Thomas Flint, Billingsley Kaambwa, Ruth Walker, Gill Lewin, Mary Luszcz, Ian D. Cameronen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishingen
dc.rights© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016en
dc.subjectOlder people; younger people; quality of life; health status; economic evaluationen
dc.titleDoes one size fit all? Assessing the preferences of older and younger people for attributes of quality of lifeen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030098641en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11136-016-1391-6en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP110200079en
dc.identifier.pubid439291-
pubs.library.collectionPublic Health publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS03en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Aurora submissions

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.