Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/114125
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRodriguez Lopez, Carlos Marcelino-
dc.contributor.authorHu, Yikang-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/114125-
dc.description.abstractGrapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) is widely used for winemaking all over the world. Drought and heat stresses are two of the major abiotic stresses reducing grape quality and yield. However, drought and heat tolerance are still poorly characterized in perennial crops such as grapevine. During this study, stomatal conductance, stem water potential and leaf temperature were measured to determine plant physiological status. RNA-seq technology was used for the analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of leaf samples between the control and three treatments, which were drought, heat and a combined treatment. Gene expression profiles were grouped by treatments and timepoints. The great majority of unique DEGs were found to be induced by the combined drought and heat treatment. 169 up-regulated genes were induced by drought, 85 by heat and 1218 by the combined treatment; 78 down-regulated genes were induced by drought, 72 by heat and 1427 by the combined treatment. Three potential and significant regulation pathways of stress response were identified based on Gene Ontology (GO) analysis i.e. cytokinin-activated signalling pathway, ion transport pathway and Nitric Oxide-mediated pathway. This study provides preliminary insights into the transcriptomic response to drought and heat stress in grapevine.en
dc.subjectcourseworken
dc.subjectgrapevineen
dc.subjectRNA-seqen
dc.subjectdroughten
dc.subjectheaten
dc.subjectdifferentially expressed genesen
dc.subjectgene ontologyen
dc.titleTemporal gene expression analysis reveals a synergistic effect of combined drought and heat stress in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)en
dc.typeThesesen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wineen
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legalsen
dc.description.dissertationThesis (M.Bio.(PB)) -- University of Adelaide, Masters of Biotechnology (Plant Biotechnology), School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, 2017.en
Appears in Collections:School of Agriculture, Food and Wine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf73.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf2.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Permissions
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only141.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Restricted_1
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only2.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Restricted_2
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only2.89 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.