Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/107426
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFincher, Geoffrey Bruce-
dc.contributor.advisorBurton, Rachel Anita-
dc.contributor.advisorHrmova, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorSchwerdt, Julian George-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/107426-
dc.description.abstractThe plant cell wall is central to the success of the embryophyte radiation. The high tensile strength of the cell wall supports complex branching architectures adapted to a varying and highly competitive environment. The cell wall has also played an integral role during the evolution of multicellularity by bonding cells together, controlling cell differentiation, acting as an energy store and mediating chemical signals. Polysaccharides are the dominant component of the plant cell wall and the genes involved in their biosynthesis are a major focus of cell wall research. The work presented in this thesis aims to reconstruct the evolutionary history and selection dynamics of the embryophyte cellulose synthase (CesA) and cellulose synthase-like (Csl) superfamily. The commercially significant Poaceae (grasses) have received considerable attention. The commercially significant Poaceae (grasses) have received considerable attention from the plant cell wall research community, not least because they are unique in containing a high abundance of (1,3;1,4)-β-glucan. Chapter 2 reconstructs the molecular phylogeny and evolutionary dynamics of the CesA superfamily in the Poaceae. Bayesian and likelihood-based models yielded a well-resolved gene tree for the superfamily and revealed heterogeneous selection pressures among amino acid sites. To provide a functional context to these findings, an energetically refined homology model of HvCslF6 was constructed — this is an important enzyme implicated in the biosynthesis of (1,3;1,4)-β-glucan — that was used to map amino-acid residues under selection onto a three-dimensional structure. Analyses performed for Chapter 2 showed that the CslJ clade was conspicuous in having a level of historical divergence too high for the evolutionary models used. As high divergence could indicate functional shift, the focus in Chapter 3 was on the phylogenetic analysis and functional characterisation of CslJ. Phylogenetic analyses of CslE, CslJ and CslG families across an improved taxonomic sampling of fully sequenced eudicot and monocot species were performed and experimental evidence that CslJ is implicated in the biosynthesis of (1,3;1,4)-β-glucan is presented. Selection tests show that the CslJ lineage has undergone a significant long term shift in selection pressure and while the causative factors behind this are unknown, the presence of three highly diverged gene families mediating the synthesis of (1,3;1,4)-β-glucan presents an interesting case study in coevolution. The broad distribution of gene families capable of (1,3;1,4)-β-glucan synthesis across the CesA superfamily tree highlights the difficulty in mapping polysaccharide product to phylogenetic structure. This difficulty is compounded by significant systematic confusion; superfamily members in species are named in order of discovery or by homology to different organisms. In Chapter 4, this confusion is addressed using model-based analyses to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships and infer duplication events among the CesA and Csl genes of 22 fully sequenced angiosperms. The recovered phylogenetic history and identified discriminatory protein motifs were used to construct a revised system for naming new and existing CesA and Csl genes.en
dc.subjectcelluloseen
dc.subjectevolutionen
dc.subjectplant cell wallen
dc.subjectResearch by Publication-
dc.titleThe evolutionary history and dynamics of the cellulose synthase superfamilyen
dc.typeThesesen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wineen
dc.provenanceCopyright material removed from digital thesis. See print copy in University of Adelaide Library for full text.en
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals-
dc.description.dissertationThesis (Ph.D.) (Research by Publication) -- University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, 2017.en
dc.identifier.doi10.4225/55/59a75ef9afec5-
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf532.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf5.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Permissions
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only387.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Restricted
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only9.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.