Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/104100
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The first comprehensive report on Indigenous Australian women's inequalities in cervical screening: a retrospective registry cohort study in Queensland, Australia (2000-2011)
Author: Whop, L.
Garvey, G.
Baade, P.
Cunningham, J.
Lokuge, K.
Brotherton, J.
Valery, P.
O'Connell, D.
Canfell, K.
Diaz, A.
Roder, D.
Gertig, D.
Moore, S.
Condon, J.
Citation: Cancer, 2016; 122(10):1560-1569
Publisher: Wiley
Issue Date: 2016
ISSN: 0008-543X
1097-0142
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Lisa J. Whop, Gail Garvey, Peter Baade, Joan Cunningham, Kamalini Lokuge, Julia M. L. Brotherton, Patricia C. Valery, Dianne L. O, Connell, Karen Canfell, Abbey Diaz, David Roder, Dorota Gertig, Suzanne P. Moore and John R. Condon
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Australian National Cervical Screening Program, introduced more than 20 years ago, does not record the Indigenous status of screening participants. This article reports the first population-based estimates of participation in cervical screening for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian women. METHODS: This was a retrospective, population-based study of 1,334,795 female Queensland residents, aged 20 to 69 years, who participated in cervical screening from 2000 to 2011; 26,829 were identified as Indigenous through linkage to hospitalization records. Participation rates were calculated as the number of women screened divided by the average estimated resident population, with adjustments made for hysterectomies, for each 2-, 3-, and 5-year screening period. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which were adjusted for age group, place of residence, and socioeconomic disadvantage. RESULTS: In 2010-2011, the 2-year participation rate was 55.7% (95% CI, 55.6%-55.9%) for non-Indigenous women and 33.5% (95% CI, 32.9%-34.1%) for Indigenous women; this represented a decrease from 2000-2001 (57.7% [95% CI, 57.6%-57.9%] and 35.3% [95% CI, 34.5%-36.1%], respectively). The difference between Indigenous and non-Indigenous women was greatest for those aged 45 to 49 years. The 3- and 5-year participation rates were higher within both groups, and the absolute differences between the 2 groups were larger. Significant interactions between the Indigenous status and the place of residence and socioeconomic disadvantage highlight that the Indigenous/non-Indigenous differential was evident in all places of residence except for very remote areas (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.95-1.02) and was greatest in the most affluent areas (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.24-0.27). CONCLUSIONS: Indigenous Australian women participate less than non-Indigenous women, and this gap has not closed. These results provide important benchmarks for the new Australian cervical screening program commencing in 2017, which will provide opportunities to reduce inequities for Indigenous women and address longstanding data deficiencies in the collection of the Indigenous status. Cancer 2016;122:1560-9. VC 2016 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Keywords: cancer; cervical screening; early detection; health care disparities; Indigenous Australian; Papanicolaou (Pap) test
Rights: © 2016 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
RMID: 0030064795
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29954
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1045591
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1058244
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1083090
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1082989
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1055587
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1041111
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_104100.pdfPublished version411.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.