Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/104054
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLangridge, Peter-
dc.contributor.advisorWhitford, Ryan-
dc.contributor.authorNagahatenna, Dilrukshi Shashikala Kumari-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/104054-
dc.description.abstractThe tetrapyrrole biosynthesis pathway leads to chlorophyll and heme production and plays a key role in primary physiological processes such as photosynthesis and respiration. Recent studies have shed light on heme as a potential candidate molecule for triggering stress defence responses. However, detailed investigations are yet to be conducted to elucidate the potential role of heme in regulating responses to complex abiotic stress conditions such as drought. The terminal enzyme of heme biosynthesis is Ferrochelatase (FC), for which there are two isoforms encoded by separate genes (FC1 and FC2). Previous studies propose that the two FCs synthesize two physiologically distinct heme pools with different cellular functions. The overall scientific goal of this thesis was to investigate the roles of the two FCs in photosynthesis, drought and oxidative stress tolerance. In this study, barley (Hordeum vulgare) was used as both a major cereal crop and also as a model plant for other commercially relevant rain-fed cereal crops. Two FCs in barley (HvFC1 and HvFC2) were identified and their tissue-specific and stress-responsive expression patterns were investigated. These genes were cloned from the cultivar Golden Promise (GP) and transgenic lines ectopically overexpressing either HvFC1 or HvFC2 were generated. From 29 independent T₀ transgenic lines obtained for each FC construct, three single-copy transgenic lines ectopically overexpressing either HvFC1 or HvFC2 were evaluated for photosynthetic performance, oxidative and drought stress tolerance. The two HvFC isoforms share a common catalytic FC domain, while HvFC2 additionally contains C-terminal chlorophyll a/b binding (CAB) domain. The two genes are differentially expressed in photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic tissues and have distinct stress responsive expression profiles, implying that they may have distinct roles. Transgenic plants ectopically overexpressing either HvFC1 or HvFC2 exhibited significantly higher chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance (gs) [s subscript], carboxylation efficiency (CE) and photosynthetic rate relative to controls under both non-stressed and drought stress conditions. Furthermore, these transgenics, showed wilting avoidance and maintained higher leaf water content and water use efficiency relative to control plants when subjected to drought stress. Overexpression of HvFCs significantly up-regulated nuclear genes associated with ROS detoxification under drought stress. It also reduced photo-oxidative damage caused by perturbation of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in tigrinaᵈ¹² mutants. Taken together, this study indicates that both HvFCs play roles in photosynthesis and improving oxidative and drought stress tolerance. The results reported in this thesis suggest that both HvFC derived heme pools are likely to be involved in chloroplast-to-nuclear retrograde signaling to trigger drought and oxidative stress tolerance. This study also highlights the tetrapyrrole pathway as an important target for engineering improved crop performance in both non-stressed and stressed environments.en
dc.subjectbarleyen
dc.subjecttetrapyrroleen
dc.subjecthemeen
dc.subjectferrochelataseen
dc.subjectchlorophyllen
dc.subjectdrought stressen
dc.subjectphotosynthesisen
dc.subjectphoto-oxidationen
dc.subjecttranscriptional regulationen
dc.subjectResearch by Publication-
dc.titleInvestigating the role of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis under drought stress in cereal transgenicsen
dc.typeThesesen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wineen
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legalsen
dc.description.dissertationThesis (Ph.D.) (Research by Publication) -- University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture, Food & Wine, 2015.en
dc.identifier.doi10.4225/55/58dca3ec4d5a1-
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf517.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf3.94 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Permissions
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only512.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Restricted
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only3.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.